“Creationists defend their dinosaur museums and attractions as a way to teach a grander purpose: If the Bible’s history is accurate, then so is its morality.”
Fallacy, anyone? Cali, I know you can see it.
Matt Burton-Kelly's home on the Web
“Creationists defend their dinosaur museums and attractions as a way to teach a grander purpose: If the Bible’s history is accurate, then so is its morality.”
Fallacy, anyone? Cali, I know you can see it.
So, here I sit, attempting to both figure out the snafu with the UND only recommendation system and why SLU won’t talk to it and try to find some articles without going to a library right now. Even if I did go, it would be UVM, so it wouldn’t be that good. No offense UVM, but I don’t like your library, and I think it needs more geology journals. That’s all.
What I am looking for right now is a list of all the journals UVM subscribes to, so I can see if a trip maybe would be worth my time. I doubt I will find it, everything is search based now, and you can’t just look and see if a journal just may have what you are looking for.
How does the entry for ‘a’ have almost 10,000 entries? They don’t have that many journals!!! I am le confused.
So I guess I’ll wait and write some more, and go through all the articles I haven’t quite read through yet…
BEIJING Sep 17, 2005 — North Korean disarmament talks resumed Sunday as
chief envoys from the six nations met to resolve a dispute over a
Chinese proposal to allow Pyongyang keep its civilian atomic power
program after it disarms. ABC News.
Here’s my deal: The US needs to get rid of an equal percentage of our
own nukes if we ask other nations to stand down their arsenals. If we
ask them to get rid of their power plants, we should remove ours as
well. Fair is fair. No thought give to the notion that it’s a
wonderful source of electrical energy, no matter where you live, or
that we’d all be better off without warheads. Especially the United
States.
Dayrat, Benoit (2005) Ancestor-descendant relationships and the reconstruction of the Tree of Life Paleobiology 2005 31: 347-353.
Someone remind me I need to get this article.
Someone at least agrees with me.
This NYT editorial almost has it right–but right now we don’t need to blame anyone. Let’s get the job done. Put a moratorium on blaming people, and fix NO [New Orleans, 2014-02-05] and everywhere else that got messed up by Katrina (hurray for my first Katrina-related post that has nothing to do with a stripper in Montreal). I don’t care whose fault it is. It could be Bush, it could be the NO government, it could be the friggin Democratic party for all I care. It could be the hippies or the glaciers, or even the elves. But pointing my finger at someone and saying “He did it!” never fixed whatever it was I had just broken.
On an aside, it’s really no one’s fault. We don’t need to blame people, we need to help people. 300 years of building your city below sea level on a coast that is repeatedly subjected to hurricanes, and nobody sees this as a bad idea in the first place? (this is what I like to call “blaming people who don’t care anymore). Seriously, to paraphrase what my mum said tonight, if Mother Nature doesn’t want a city there that night, then you had better believe it won’t be there in the morning.
[EDIT: Regarding the title, it probably refers to a movie we made for AP English at the end of my senior year of high school. We used dyed corn syrup as blood (yes, that kind of movie). Carry on. 2014-02-05]
“One of us spent years as an Oxford tutor and it was his habit to choose controversial topics for the students’ weekly essays. They were required to go to the library, read about both sides of an argument, give a fair account of both, and then come to a balanced judgment in their essay. The call for balance, by the way, was always tempered by the maxim, ‘When two opposite points of view are expressed with equal intensity, the truth does not necessarily lie exactly half way between. It is possible for one side simply to be wrong.'”
Living the Scientific Life (or Scientist, Interrupted)
Birds, today. EDIT: Updated link: http://scienceblogs.com/grrlscientist/
“If all mankind minus one were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.”
[John Stuart Mill, English philosopher (1806-1873)]
Contemplate and consider.
I find it difficult that we compare natural disasters on the basis of how much financial damage they cause. A large storm today will destroy more property than it did a hundred years ago, simply because we have more property. It might be useful to scale it according to the percentage of the national debt accumulated during the current presidency.
I would much rather focus on the amount [number, 2014-02-04] of people who have died. In this right, I think Katrina has not been our country’s largest natural disaster.
(on another scale note, I heard on the news today that people are buying more gas than ever, regardless of the price at the pump. Of course more gas is being bought: there are more people driving, and more SUVs and trucks on the road than ever before.)