“Now we are being told that we should spend billions not just on rebuilding houses and roads but on re-engineering the environment as well. Louisiana’s coastal scientists, engineers and politicians suggest that without this coastal restoration project, all other efforts will be endangered. But it’s not that simple, for several reasons.”
Forced Marsh – New York Times
These guys are approaching a good point, which should be ‘we don’t need to re-engineer something that would work perfectly well without us being involved. Furthermore, there isn’t land there anymore, and we have no reason to waste billions of dollars creating new places for stupid people to build their houses when there are plenty of other good places to live, especially federal money.’ Let people do what they want as individuals, but I see no reason for the rest of the country to have to pay for building an Atlantis in the middle of the Gulf of Mexico.
[EDIT: This post is interesting to me, not least because my opinion on religion has subtly changed over the years. There’s no need to rag on people for being religious, but I do still see the need to rag on people who claim that religion equals science. 2014-02-05]
Yay! The retort to Darwinism (or is it evolution in general?) is best summarized as “I can’t think of a real theory, but someone must have done it.” This is from the same people who claim we can never know God because he/she/it is beyond our capacity to understand. Now, if you admit one thing is beyond your capacity to understand, doesn’t that open up the door to a lot of other things that just may be over your head?
Trial begins today
Of course, they obviously do not say ‘God’: they say ‘Deity.’ Which is okay as long as you don’t try to teach anything in particular, wink wink nudge nudge, say no more. If an Islamic group were pushing for this sort of thing it would have no chance of happening, or even a Jewish group.
Silly Christians. I get to talk about them because I suppose I qualify as one. Even if you aren’t you get to talk about them because (some of them) are just silly at times.
Anyway, I make my point that this is stupid and unconstitutional–claiming that an unknown Deity may have created everything is just as religious as claiming that God or Yahweh or Allah or Odin may have created it. Once you make a statement about a Deity, you remove the impetus to question the world around you and find out how it works, and instead cause people to start asking, ‘now what are the characteristics of this Deity, and what shall we call it?’
Evolution minor without Religion
Doesn’t seem like a problem to me. You CANNOT tell a private institution what to teach or not to teach, and you especially cannot tell tenured professors of the sciences that they should be teaching intelligent design.
I’m curious why the fact that ID will not be mentioned qualifies as news.
Creativity again…sooner or later I will photograph and upload some drawings I’ve done recently, it’s something a litte different from what I usually do, which tends toward either sculpture or multimedia/video (I even started work on a surrealist film in the vein of Salvidore Dali while in Oz, but I never finished it, due to lack of a good digital camera). Right now I’m working on drawings so I can design a series of logos for this, that, and the other thing, just in case I need them (and maybe you’ll see them sooner than you think). Strangely enough, I have never built a sculpture out of a bicycle. I think this is because I see bicycles as cheap transportation, and using parts that are still valuable to a working machine seems sacreligious. Recently I built a bookshelf out of a pair of skis and some wood from an old dresser, a pretty solid piece of work in itself that kept me occupied for a day or so.
Incidentally, I’m interested in other artistic projects while I’m still here in Vermont, whether they are sculpture or paint or drawing or film or multiedia or writing. I’m looking for people who would like to collaborate.
Speaking of which, before the site disappears (until I find a new server at least), if you are from SLU (or even if you are not, and have a grasp of world events from 2002-2003) PLEASE
visit my site on the Green Wall [edit, see Flickr] and drop me a comment here on what you think. I want to put together some sort of ‘world political picture’ book, using some of the imagery and tying it in with events on and off campus from that year. What I am looking for are memories of world events, campus events, whatever, that explain or enhance the stuff I have photographed–you will get full credit if you want it for what you supply, of course. There was so much going on that year that I was unable to write down some of the meanings behind some of the graffiti, and some of it I still don’t understand. By the way, if the pages suggest posting to some forum, don’t post there, please comment on this site only–any forum I may have set up does not exist anymore; at least, it is not active and is not likely to be ever. Thanks for the information.
“Creationists defend their dinosaur museums and attractions as a way to teach a grander purpose: If the Bible’s history is accurate, then so is its morality.”
Fallacy, anyone? Cali, I know you can see it.
So, here I sit, attempting to both figure out the snafu with the UND only recommendation system and why SLU won’t talk to it and try to find some articles without going to a library right now. Even if I did go, it would be UVM, so it wouldn’t be that good. No offense UVM, but I don’t like your library, and I think it needs more geology journals. That’s all.
What I am looking for right now is a list of all the journals UVM subscribes to, so I can see if a trip maybe would be worth my time. I doubt I will find it, everything is search based now, and you can’t just look and see if a journal just may have what you are looking for.
How does the entry for ‘a’ have almost 10,000 entries? They don’t have that many journals!!! I am le confused.
So I guess I’ll wait and write some more, and go through all the articles I haven’t quite read through yet…
BEIJING Sep 17, 2005 — North Korean disarmament talks resumed Sunday as
chief envoys from the six nations met to resolve a dispute over a
Chinese proposal to allow Pyongyang keep its civilian atomic power
program after it disarms. ABC News.
Here’s my deal: The US needs to get rid of an equal percentage of our
own nukes if we ask other nations to stand down their arsenals. If we
ask them to get rid of their power plants, we should remove ours as
well. Fair is fair. No thought give to the notion that it’s a
wonderful source of electrical energy, no matter where you live, or
that we’d all be better off without warheads. Especially the United
Dayrat, Benoit (2005) Ancestor-descendant relationships and the reconstruction of the Tree of Life Paleobiology 2005 31: 347-353.
Someone remind me I need to get this article.
Someone at least agrees with me.